"He was born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad."

-Rafael Sabatini, Scaramouche.

Monday, April 30, 2012

What I'm Reading: April 30th, 2012

Last year today I wrote a post, which I intended to be the first of many, detailing what books I was reading at that point in time.  Of course, I promptly forgot about this post, because that's how I roll.  But, with vacation coming up in a few days, I actually have a book list again.

What?  Organization?  Yeah, it surprised me too.  So, over the next two weeks and a few days (Because I have to read something between now and when I leave), I will be endeavoring to get through as many of these books as possible:

The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins.


Unfortunately, they do not have a copy of the cover for the edition I own on the internet, because it is a delightfully creepy shot of a woman in what appears to be a bride's dress.  I don't know what it is about them, but it magnificently captures the creepiness of brides.  What that has to do with the novel itself, I do not know, as I know nothing about the plot.  All I know is that I got the book for Christmas, several reliable sources have praised it, and I am excited.  Also, it's big.

And I really love big books.  It's first on my list because some of my family want to read it too, but I am insisting on reading it first.  Besides, I've been waiting for a time where I have a lot of time on my hands to crack it open since Christmas, and guess what?  Without work or social obligations, I'll have that time.

The 13th Tribe by Robert Liparulo.



Robert Liparulo is one of those writers who force me to pick up everything they do.  I've read all of his adult thrillers and one of his YA books, and I was more than ready for a new edge-of-your-seat, nonstop thriller when I heard about this book a while back.  I pre-ordered it, waited for it to arrive, but held off jumping into it so that I could finish the Smiley vs. Karla trilogy.  And now, so close to the start of my reading time, I am not going to jump on it.

It goes in after The Woman in White because after that 600 page book from 150 years ago, I figure I'll be more than ready for a fast paced thriller.  And, knowing Liparulo, it's bound to be fantastic.  I've held off on reading the synopsis, though, so once again I have no idea what I'm getting into.  The cover art is fantastic, though, and I'm one of those people who judge books by their cover.

Divergent by Veronica Roth.


So the other day I'm at a friend's house and they ask me what books I'll be reading on my vacation.  And, without a hint of irony, I tell them that I'm reading Divergent by Eli Roth.   Because, yes, I cannot differentiate between directors of slasher flicks and young adult novelists.

Veronica Roth, Kyle, get your head out of--

Anyways, this novel has been one of those books that I've meant to pick up for a long time, but never remembered once I get in the book store, so I'm curious to see what it's about.  Naturally, because YA loves this new trend, it must be the first book in a series, so I'm suspecting the ending will suck, but hey?  Some books can pull off that whole series thing and still be satisfying.

Maybe this will be one of them?

Heretics of Dune by Frank Herbert.


As it says on the cover, this is book five in the "magnificent Dune Chronicles-the Bestselling Science Fiction Adventure of All Time".  As such, I know exactly what I'm getting before I even crack the cover.  There's going to be lots of discussion of religion, politics, control, and the human condition, and all of that will be very interesting, but there will be next to none of the "Adventure" promised on the cover.

That's not what Frank Herbert's Dune series has ever been about.

It should be a nice, long read that will make me think hard about stuff, but I don't think it's going to pack the same punch that I will have seen (hopefully) in both The 13th Tribe and Divergent.  But it's worth noting that is exactly why I read.  Because I want to see a bunch of things, not just one.  If all I wanted was the same kind of story over and over again, I would not pour over Markus Zusak, Agatha Christie, Frank Herbert, John Green, and Scott Westerfeld.

All four of these books are bound to be very different from each other, and that's what drew me to pick each of them.

The Lost World by Arthur Conan Doyle.


Did you know that Arthur Conan Doyle, the man who wrote all those famous mysteries, did not like his most famous character, Sherlock Holmes?  That's why he tried to kill him off, only to find the audiences demand too strong to refuse.  What Doyle really liked, however, was his Lost World novels.

Novels about dinosaurs in South America.  If you just read "Sherlock Holmes+Dinosaurs+South America" and did not instantly open a tab to find a copy of this book at your library, there might be something wrong with you.

Seriously, this novel could be the worst written piece of tripe ever put to paper, and I will still read it because Dinosaurs in South America, that's why.

Also, the main character's name is Professor Challenger.  Seriously, why have I not read this novel before?

Civil War; Civil War: Front Line; Civil War: Spider-Man by Marvel.


This will actually be my third time through the Civil War timeline, but before I've only done Civil War and Civil War: Front Line.  My brother recently added Spider-Man to our collection, and I am stoked to see how that addition effects this epic superhero tale.

Easily one of my favorite stories, this is about the battle between two ideals, and it is amazing.  On one side, you have the classic hero, Captain America, standing for Right and Wrong over Legal and Illegal, refusing to attack his fellow heroes just because they won't register.  And against him, you have Iron Man, who wants nothing more than to make sure civilians are safe.

Whose side are you on?

Of course, carrying three massive tomes across the Rocky Mountains isn't easy, so instead these will be what keep me company until the trip starts.  Of course, as I know the ending, I don't approach this story for the same sense of "newness", but as a nerd, this stuff makes me drool.

Friday, April 27, 2012

As A Nerd, It's Important that I Say...

By now, you're all probably familiar with the character of Spider-man.  Starting as a nerdy teenager who lives with his aunt and uncle, he acquires spider-based powers like webs and climbing on walls and then goes on to fight crimes.  His uncle dies in the process, but he keeps up the good fight, often throwing out clever quips as he does it.

He's the ultimate nerd fantasy.  He goes from being the bullied skinny kid who no one notices (something most nerds can empathize with) and becomes a hilarious, brilliant hero with a beautiful love interest (something most nerds can dream about).  When he loses his uncle, he doesn't get all moody and sad like Batman.  Even though he's lost three parents (Mom, Dad, Uncle Ben), but he keeps his chin up and does whatever it takes to save the world.

Like Atlas, he carries the weight of the world on his shoulders.  But instead of buckling under it, he smirks, stands up, and acts as the white-Knight everyone dreams of being.

He first appeared in August of 1962.  In the series "The Amazing Spider-Man", he's had over six hundred and fifty issues.  The three movies involving him have made billions of dollars world-wide, a figure that's going to get even bigger when the newest edition of the character launches this summer.

Peter Parker, alias Spider-Man, is a cultural icon on the highest level.  And people who study comic books can tell you why.  As implied above, people dig the character that they wish they could be.  He's funny, quick, and not some over-privileged millionaire like Batman.  When it comes down to it, there's something attractive about a hero who has to pay rent every month.

We see a bit of ourselves in him, especially comic book nerds, so when the Green Goblin beats the tar out of him, we're firmly in Spider-Man's corner, rooting for him to take Goblin down.  This is something very important for all comic books.  They know that if you're just sold on the concept of one conflict, you might not keep buying books when that conflict ends and a new one starts (as is always the case in these extended serials).

So instead they sell you on the lowest common denominator in all of the stories: the lead.  When a series fails, it's probably because people couldn't get behind the main character.  When it goes on for six-hundred plus issues, you can bet your life fans are really in love with the protagonist.

Obviously over the fifty years since Spider-Man first swung his way into print, fans have fallen in love with him.  And so there is a lot of expectations leveled towards this new movie coming out.  After all, this is a fan-favorite they're dealing with.  Getting the character right is going to make or break it.

And naturally, these fans are quite picky about what "getting a character right" means.  As such, what I'm about to say might be offensive to some:

Skin color is rarely ever part of getting a character right.

Take Peter, again, as an example.  If a hilarious young black actor was cast in that roll, the movie would not suffer from it.  It is not important to the character of Peter Parker, if you boil him down to the essentials, that he is white.  What's important is that he's nerdy, he loves his uncle who dies, and he's funny.  This is why it made sense for Sam Raimi, in the old Spider-Man movies, to cut certain details from the character.

Like, how many non-comic book fans would understand that Spider-Man never used to shoot webs out of his wrists?  In the comics he made web-slingers which he strapped to his wrists which fired out the webs.  But, cutting that made sense to keep the focus of the movie on the actual character of Peter and the conflict between him and Green Goblin.

Part of making a transition between comics and movies is making adjustments so the story still works.  Whether we like it or not, details have to change when you distill six hundred issues of a comic series down to a two hour movie.

This is why I get so angry when people freak out about stupid stuff like that in adaptations.  Does anyone really care that Peeta's leg doesn't get infected and amputated in the movie like it does in the book?  I mean, the plot stays the same.  His character stays the same.  If it was included in the movie, it would've been a pointless, hollow detail that would've just taken more time.

And complaining about a character's skin color, if it isn't central to their character, is even stupider.  It's like if you complained that the station inspector's uniform is green in the novel, "The Invention of Hugo Cabret", but is blue in the movie "Hugo."  Of course, this is slightly different for comics because we already have a visual representation of the character in our heads.

However, before anyone freaks out because Heimdall is black in Kenneth Branaugh's "Thor" but he wasn't in the comic, think for a moment if that change of skin tone changes anything at all.  Face it, Idris Elba played that character better than anyone else could've even though he doesn't match up with the image in the comics.

This is especially prevalent with The Avengers coming out in a little while because in the older comics, Nick Fury was white but he's being played by Samuel L Jackson, who notably isn't.  But this isn't just racist, this is ignorant.  (Well, more ignorant than just normal racism)  Because when a bunch of the characters got a new look for our generation, the decision was made to make Nick Fury black.

Actually, not just black.  Before any of the movies started production, they decided to model his face specifically off of Samuel L Jackson.  That's right, in the comic world for the past few years, Nick Fury hasn't just been black, he's looked like the actor they cast to play him.

But, did that stop people who know absolutely nothing about comics from complaining about the casting?  No, because humans are silly.  I've already seen this a couple of times in the past little while, and it's not from smart people.  It's very sad, pathetic people who think that skin color is always entirely central to who the character is.

Why make the switch from white to black?  Because they thought the change would work, and it wouldn't change the center of his character enough to cause a problem.  That's right, Nick Fury's skin color isn't something so important to the story that they could change it.

That's because they're not racist.

Make no mistake, there are stories where a character's skin color is essential to the character.  If someone wanted to remake To Kill A Mockingbird with either an all white or all black cast, that would work about as well as making Alan Wake a basketball player rather than a writer.  If someone made Poirot into a British Lord rather than a fat Belgian they would ruin a lot of what was fun about his character.

But, is any part of what makes Spider-Man the character we love dependent on his skin tone?  No, of course not.  It wasn't important for Heimdall to be white, it wasn't important for Nick Fury to be white.  So, if you think that complaining about that is worthwhile, think again.  Personally, I suspect there will be plenty to complain about after The Avengers anyways.

You might as well spend your breath on something that actually means anything to anyone at all.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Things I Love Thursdays:

-Comic books.
-Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier beta.
-Murder mysteries.
-Retro Sci-Fi.
-BBBFF.
-Vacation in a week.
-Superheroes.
-My Internet friends.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Royal Wedding

This is obviously the first time I'm excited to watch a royal wedding.  Yes.  I said excited.



Thursday, April 19, 2012

Things I Love Thursday:

-Smiley's People.
-The Invention of Hugo Cabret.
-The Importance of Being Earnest.
-The 13th Tribe.
-My Internet friends.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Learning

So, since I had some spare time and the infinite capacity for terrible ideas, I decided to engage in some good ol' fashioned narcissism recently.  Cracking open my laptop, I worked my way to the folder I marked as "Book Stuff" long, long ago.  Like much of my computer, it reflects my desire and passion for order which effects all of my life until it meets my endless laziness.

But, in that folder I keep a sub-folder for each novel so I can keep virtual scratch paper grouped with the novel those ideas are meant for, and it is kept in rough chronological order.  Starting at the top, I opened the first book I ever wrote and worked my way down the list, reading the first chapter of each and every one of them.  To put it bluntly, it was hilarious and terrifying.

My first novel, which received the rank of finalist in a contest of my peers, included winner lines like:

"His eyes were not blinking, and his gaze never left my face.  Jones moved around the table, shifting awkwardly on his feet, but Weir never even shifted on his feet."


Or...



 “What evidence do you have against me?” I said as the blood drained from my face.


And what about my terribly subtle way of describing the character's appearance?



"Well for starters the neighbor across the street saw a man with black hair, like yours. She couldn't make out what you were wearing, but stated that your build was big and muscular. In fact, she said that the killer was probably somewhere between 6'3” and 6'7”. As you must know, you stand 6'5”, and your build would be classified 'muscular'."


And yes, I will put this plainly right now, when I wrote this book, I thought I was working on something really fantastic.  And I continued to think that for the entire year I spent revising it to get it as good as those sections are.  I revised the entire book seven times, and the dialog is still that bad.

In fact, it gets worse from there, because I put extra effort into the first chapter, since the contest I entered it into centered around the start of the novel.  Now, while I read it today, I was torn between blushing like a beet and laughing like a maniac.

But then, things got worse.

A Shotgun with No Shells, my hated middle child.  It was a western set in a town in a drought that is being plagued by an outlaw and his band of crooks.  But wait!  There's more!  The novel also featured a train robbery where the outlaws knocked trees over onto the tracks to stop it, a crooked law-man, a righteous preacher-man, and an Indian side-kick!

Shipped complete with dialog that sounds exactly like what a teenager in the modern world would say!

It was really that cliche and ridiculous.

Things got a little better with my next book, Project Theta, but don't think that it doesn't have a pile of shames of it's own too.  For instance, two judges for a contest both told me, without the other knowing, that I got the name wrong.  They also decided that the first dozen pages or so is pointless and should be cut.

As well, a huge aspect of the novel was that one character ends up betraying the group, and because I knew this, I tried not to feature that character much because I hated them, so everyone saw that twist coming a mile away.

But, more and more I noticed, the first chapter in that book didn't suck as much as the other two!  Huzzah!

And then... I cracked open the books that followed it.  And guess what?  They sucked.  I couldn't make myself finish either of the two books after PT because they were both terrible.

With a touch of sadness, I opened my most recent book.  And, to my surprise, I loved it.  Maybe its just because I'm currently working on it, but I read the first chapter and found myself smiling by the end of it with sincere satisfaction.  It has a long way to go before it is actually good, but it is a step up and a step forward.

If this story were to go the way I want it to, I would explain that I started terrible with my first book, and that I've been going upwards ever since, but I know that's not true.  As a little tyke, I was a math nerd, and I hated English.  Getting me to write anything was a struggle and a half.  But here I am, a registered English Major taking no math courses what-so-ever.

It's like the band Showbread.  When my older brother started to listen to them, I made fun of him and despised every note that band made.  And then, one day I found myself listen to the lyrics and actually giving the band a chance, and I discovered something new.

That band wasn't just good, they were fantastic.  Their lyrics inspired me, and their songs energized me.  I heard lines like, "I wish I never saw his name written on your note-book, I wish I didn't break my neck to take another look," and I felt their emotion.  I listened to Matthias Replaces Judas, and I heard their passion for Christ.  And when they chose to release their newest album for free, I saw their generosity, and I had to give up my hate.

From then on, I listened to music better.

You see, if I were in a book, there's no way I would be a hero, an ally, or a villain.  Because always there's some scene where we find out that the character has some sort of special power that they're just naturally good with, and that's not me.  When it comes to starting, I suck at everything.  I'm kinda surprised that I figured out breathing as fast as I did.

Make no mistake, the best I could do in any story is a background character.  (Love interest is out of the question unless you're appealing to that niche market of girls who like nerdy book-worms who spend all day working on computers, ladies.)

I mean, when you watch a movie and the character picks up a sword for the first time, they destroy everyone and the instructor nods, then mutters something about them being the chosen one.  When I had my first fencing competition, I only won one of my seven fights, and that was after months of training.

I don't have natural skills.  Any ability I've attained has been through blood, sweat, and tears.  (Especially that last one.  I've always been a cry-baby.)  And even there, I still suck pretty bad at pretty much everything.  The list of instruments I can play is a blank paper unless you count being able to play one song.  Running for any distance is enough to make my legs turn to jello.  Really, name a skill and you've got a good chance of naming something I can't do.

Which reminds me, do you know what's the most depressing part of the first book I wrote?  I messed up "to/too", "I/Me", and "effect/affect."  Most of those are in the first stinking chapter!

But, in the end, I find this all encouraging.  You see, I have the ability to screw up pretty much everything, but I think I can also learn from my mistakes.  The Fly-by-Night is an objectively terrible novel, but I like Grim.

I might have gotten my butt handed to me in my first fights, but in the last one I only lost a single match.

I might screw up everything the first time I try it, but that's just part of me and I need to get past that if I'm going to do anything with this great mystery we call life.

Because when the Nile floods, it leaves behind fertile ground for farming.  And when I approach my life, I want to make sure that I never flood because floods get out of hand really fast, but the best things from my life have all been born there.  My brother, the single best human being I know, isn't close to me because I've found out how to be perfect.

He's close to me because he's learned how to live with me when I act like a raging moron, and how to look past how sucky I can be at being a human.

I'm not alone at this.  It took Dean Koontz fourty novels to get to his really good work.  Isaac Asimov wrote a million words of fiction before selling his first novel.  And Five Iron Frenzy's latest song sounds a lot better than their first album.  And guess what?  The best episode of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic came from season 2.

So now, approaching this next year, I have to realize that I have plenty of opportunity for failing horribly.  Starting college, learning a new language, paying bills; it's all new territory where I can mess everything up all over again.  But maybe if I make a horrible fool of myself, that's just a new and better flood which can destroy me, or leave me a chance to start all over again.

And maybe that's why I like Grim, too.  Because, like Grim, I'm a work in progress, so even when there are problems, I know there's always a chance they'll end up getting fixed.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Stallion



See?  This is why My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic is just like real life.  Every time I think I find a prospective partner who is pretty normal, I find out they're strangely obsessed with tubs of jelly.

Also, note that Sweetie Bell totally gives a pony a noogie at a funeral.  Awkward.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Good Friday



"It is so that my transgressions have borne their withered fruit.
The sun has scorched the rising plants; alas, they have no roots.
The bleached bones of animals, bound by leather strips,
dance through the air with laughter as I wield this wicked whip.

As you did warn me, Carpenter, this world has weakened my heart.
So easily I disparage, self-seeking the work of my art.
And there you have come to me, at the moment I bathe in my sorrow,
so in love with myself, sought after avoiding tomorrow.

Where do you find the love to offer he who betrays You?
And offer to wash my feet as I offer to disobey You?
Your beauty does bereave me, and all my words do fail.
So faithfully and dutifully, I award you with betrayal.

The weak and the downtrodden
fall on broken legs.
As I walk past a smile I cast,
fever in my stead.

My bones, like plastic, do buckle backward now.
I lay in this field by Judas, anticipate the plow.
I cannot be forgiven.  My wages will be paid.
For those more lovely and admirable is least among the saved.

And where would I be, Jesus?
What place is left for me?
The price of atonement is more than I've found to offer as my plea.

Jesus, my heart is all I have to give to you.
So weak, and so unworthy, this simply will not do.
No alabaster jar?  No diamond in the rough?
For Your body that was broken, how can this be enough?

By me You were abandoned, by me You were betrayed!
And in Your arms and in Your heart forever I have stayed.
Your glory illuminated my life, and no darkness will descend.
For You have loved me forever, and Your love will never end."

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Things I Love Thursdays:

-Showbread.
-Friends making movies.
-'80s spy novels.
-Hawaii in four weeks.
-Getting accepted into college.
-John Green.
-Fencing.
-The Light of Things Hoped For.
-Murder Mysteries.
-My internet friends.

The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games in a nutshell:


Don't even try to tell me I'm wrong.